Posterior pelvic pain provocation test is negative in patients with lumbar herniated discs.

Eur Spine J. 2009 Apr 24; Gutke A, Hansson ER, Zetherström G, Ostgaard HCThe classification of pelvic girdle pain can only be reached after lumbar causes have been excluded by a clinical examination. During clinical examination, the posterior pelvic pain provocation test is a well-established method for verifying pelvic girdle pain. However, a criticism of pelvic pain provocation tests is that they may have an effect on lumbar structures, thus yielding false-positive results. The posterior pelvic pain provocation test was performed with four groups of patients: patients with computed tomography-verified disc herniations (1) on the waiting list for surgery (14 women; 9 men); (2) 6 weeks after disc surgery (18 women, 12 men); (3) pregnant women seeking care for pelvic girdle pain (n = 25); and (4) women with persistent pelvic girdle pain after delivery (n = 32). The sensitivity of the posterior pelvic pain provocation test was 0.88 and the specificity was 0.89. The positive predictive value was 0.89 and the negative predictive value was 0.87. Analysis of only women showed similar results. In our study, the posterior pelvic pain provocation test was negative in patients with a well-defined lumbar diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation, both before and after disc surgery. Our results are an important step toward the more accurate classification of lumbopelvic pain.

Sporting activity following discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

Orthopedics. 2008 Aug; 31(8): 756Dollinger V, Obwegeser AA, Gabl M, Lackner P, Koller M, Galiano KThe aim of this study was to investigate to what extent patients could resume physical activity following surgery for herniated lumbar disks. We analyzed a cohort of 1003 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery within 1 year. Out of this cohort, 93 patients were selected according to our inclusion criteria (age 20-35 years, mediolateral single level disk herniation, no comorbidity at the lumbar spine, and treatment with conventional subtotal diskectomy). This group was evaluated after a minimum follow-up of 28 months in a telephone questionnaire; participants were questioned about pre- and postoperative physical activities. The questionnaire was answered by 67 patients. Twenty-six patients were lost to follow-up because they had relocated. The follow-up group had a mean age of 30 years. Five patients underwent a second procedure due to recurrent disk herniation. All patients showed a pain reduction. At follow-up, no patient needed constant pain medication. Eighty-two percent of the patients were pain free during practicing sports. Sixty-two patients performed some type of sport after surgery. Concerning the type and frequency of physical activities, no significant change between pre- and postoperative behavior occurred. The 5 patients with recurrent disk herniation did not behave differently. Single-level lumbar disk surgery does not limit or compromise sportive activity in young people.

Delayed hyper-reactivity to metal ions after cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review.

Spine. 2009 Apr 1; 34(7): E262-5Cavanaugh DA, Nunley PD, Kerr EJ, Werner DJ, Jawahar ASTUDY DESIGN: Anecdotal case report. OBJECTIVE: To report a very interesting and perplexing complication of cervical total disc arthroplasty that has not been previously reported in literature. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although there has been increasing interest in the field of artificial disc replacement to treat cervical degenerative disc disease, not much has been mentioned in the literature about the potential complications of the disc itself. We encountered a delayed complication in 1 patient that has not been reported in the literature. METHOD: Thirty-nine-year-old white woman received total disc arthroplasty for herniated intervertebral disc at C5-C6 level uneventfully. She had recurrence of symptoms 9 months after the procedure and failed to respond to conservative measurements. Imaging revealed soft tissue mass posterior to the implanted disc encroaching the spinal cord. RESULTS: Surgical explantation and exploration of the disc space revealed thick layer of abnormal hyaline cartilaginous tissue with chronic inflammatory debris. The patient had complete resolution of symptoms after the revision surgery. CONCLUSION: Although there is increased enthusiasm about motion preservation technology and disc replacement surgery for intervertebral disc herniation, unexpected complications like the present case need to be shared within the scientific community to better understand the risks associated with these new and promising devices.

Results of Microendoscopic Discectomy Performed in the 26 Cases with a Minimum 3 Years Follow-up.

Chang Gung Med J. 2009 Jan-Feb; 32(1): 89-97Chang SS, Fu TS, Liang YC, Lia PL, Niu CC, Chen LH, Chen WJBackground: Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is less invasive than conventional open discectomy, but the long-term benefits of this technique are still debated. Controversy also remains regarding the surgical indications, patient selection, effectiveness, learning curve and complications. Methods: From Dec 2001 to Dec 2003, 26 patients with lumbar herniated disc disease received MED. The surgical indications included the following: (1) unilateral, single level lumbar disc herniation; (2) signs and symptoms compatible with the involved nerve root; (3) failure of conservative treatment. These cases were the initial MEDs performed by one of our senior authors (TS FU). Clinical symptoms and outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Scores. Results: Treatment in two cases was changed to open discectomy because of irreparable dural tears during surgery. For the remaining 24 cases, the average intraoperative blood loss was 55.8 mL. The average operation length was 136.8 minutes and the average post-surgical hospital stay was 2.4 days. At 12 weeks after the operation, 22 achieved excellent or good results. The satisfactory rate was 91.7%. On final follow-up, 21 patients had excellent or good results. The satisfactory rate was 87.5%. Complications included two irreparable dural tears, two superficial wound infections and one pseudomenigocele. Conclusions: Our data indicate that MED is an effective procedure for lumbar disc herniation. The result is satisfactory under adequate surgical indications and patient selection. Despite the low complication rate, dural tears still remain a concern during the learning stage.